OpenText Functional Testing vs Moderne
A side-by-side look at pricing plans, free tiers, features, pros and cons, updated for 2026. OpenText Functional Testing starts at See pricing page and Moderne starts at See pricing page. Check both pricing pages for current plans.
Enterprise test automation with AI object recognition, formerly UFT One
Free trialAt a glance
Best for
Pricing model
Starting price
Free plan
Made by
Based in
Rating
Key features
- AI object recognition
- Regression and API testing
- Model-based testing
- Desktop, web and mobile support
- On-premises or cloud deployment
- Moddy multi-repo agent
- OpenRewrite recipes
- Lossless semantic tree
- Org-wide code search
- Vulnerability remediation
| Feature | OpenText Functional Testing | Moderne |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Enterprise test automation with AI object recognition, formerly UFT One | Multi-repo code refactoring platform built on OpenRewrite |
| Category | Coding | Coding |
| Pricing model | Free trial | Paid |
| Starting price | See pricing page | See pricing page |
| Free plan | No, trial available | No |
| Made by | OpenText | Moderne |
| Based in | Canada | United States |
| Rating | No ratings yet | No ratings yet |
| Key features |
|
|
Pricing compared
OpenText Functional Testing starts at See pricing page and Moderne starts at See pricing page. Check both pricing pages for current plans.
Free plan
Cheapest paid plan
Top plan
Free trial
3 plans
Commercial
$250K typical
- Hybrid SaaS in your cloud and region
- Unlimited transformations
- Unlimited impact analyses
Enterprise
$2M typical
- Forward deployed engineers
- Transactable via cloud marketplace
Fully Managed Service
$5M typical
- Moderne owns the outcome SLA
- Full-time project management
Prices in USD, checked Oct 28, 2026 or later. Plans change often, so confirm on each tool's site before you buy.
Pros and cons
OpenText Functional Testing
- Covers many application technologies
- AI makes tests less brittle
- Long track record in enterprise QA
- Pricing not published
- Heavyweight for small teams
- Licensing can be complex
Moderne
- Deterministic, verifiable edits
- Works across thousands of repos
- Open-source recipe engine
- Built for large enterprises
- Pricing only through sales
Which one should you choose?
Choose OpenText Functional Testing if you want:
- Covers many application technologies
- AI makes tests less brittle
- Long track record in enterprise QA
Watch out: pricing not published.
Choose Moderne if you want:
- Deterministic, verifiable edits
- Works across thousands of repos
- Open-source recipe engine
Watch out: built for large enterprises.
OpenText Functional Testing vs Moderne FAQ
What is the difference between OpenText Functional Testing and Moderne?
OpenText Functional Testing: Enterprise test automation with AI object recognition, formerly UFT One. Moderne: Multi-repo code refactoring platform built on OpenRewrite. Both are coding tools.
Is OpenText Functional Testing or Moderne cheaper?
OpenText Functional Testing starts at See pricing page and Moderne starts at See pricing page. Check both pricing pages for current plans.
Do OpenText Functional Testing and Moderne have free plans?
OpenText Functional Testing: No, trial available. Moderne: No.
Who makes OpenText Functional Testing?
OpenText Functional Testing is made by OpenText, based in Canada.
Who makes Moderne?
Moderne is made by Moderne, based in United States.
Which should I choose, OpenText Functional Testing or Moderne?
Choose OpenText Functional Testing if you value covers many application technologies and ai makes tests less brittle. Choose Moderne if you value deterministic, verifiable edits and works across thousands of repos.