OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca
A side-by-side look at pricing plans, free tiers, features, pros and cons, updated for 2026. OpenText Functional Testing starts at See pricing page and Tricentis Tosca starts at See pricing page. Check both pricing pages for current plans.
Enterprise test automation with AI object recognition, formerly UFT One
Free trialAt a glance
Best for
Pricing model
Starting price
Free plan
Made by
Based in
Rating
Key features
- AI object recognition
- Regression and API testing
- Model-based testing
- Desktop, web and mobile support
- On-premises or cloud deployment
- Model-based test automation
- Agentic test generation
- Parallel cloud execution
- SAP and Oracle testing
- Codeless test design
| Feature | OpenText Functional Testing | Tricentis Tosca |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Enterprise test automation with AI object recognition, formerly UFT One | Codeless, AI-assisted end-to-end test automation for enterprises |
| Category | Coding | Coding |
| Pricing model | Free trial | Free trial |
| Starting price | See pricing page | See pricing page |
| Free plan | No, trial available | No, trial available |
| Made by | OpenText | Tricentis |
| Based in | Canada | – |
| Rating | No ratings yet | No ratings yet |
| Key features |
|
|
Pricing compared
OpenText Functional Testing starts at See pricing page and Tricentis Tosca starts at See pricing page. Check both pricing pages for current plans.
Free plan
Cheapest paid plan
Top plan
Free trial
Prices in USD, checked Nov 5, 2026 or later. Plans change often, so confirm on each tool's site before you buy.
Pros and cons
OpenText Functional Testing
- Covers many application technologies
- AI makes tests less brittle
- Long track record in enterprise QA
- Pricing not published
- Heavyweight for small teams
- Licensing can be complex
Tricentis Tosca
- Non-developers can build tests
- Tests survive app changes
- Covers major enterprise systems
- No public pricing
- Heavy for small teams
- Learning curve for model-based testing
Which one should you choose?
Choose OpenText Functional Testing if you want:
- Covers many application technologies
- AI makes tests less brittle
- Long track record in enterprise QA
Watch out: pricing not published.
Choose Tricentis Tosca if you want:
- Non-developers can build tests
- Tests survive app changes
- Covers major enterprise systems
Watch out: no public pricing.
OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca FAQ
What is the difference between OpenText Functional Testing and Tricentis Tosca?
OpenText Functional Testing: Enterprise test automation with AI object recognition, formerly UFT One. Tricentis Tosca: Codeless, AI-assisted end-to-end test automation for enterprises. Both are coding tools.
Is OpenText Functional Testing or Tricentis Tosca cheaper?
OpenText Functional Testing starts at See pricing page and Tricentis Tosca starts at See pricing page. Check both pricing pages for current plans.
Do OpenText Functional Testing and Tricentis Tosca have free plans?
OpenText Functional Testing: No, trial available. Tricentis Tosca: No, trial available.
Who makes OpenText Functional Testing?
OpenText Functional Testing is made by OpenText, based in Canada.
Who makes Tricentis Tosca?
Tricentis Tosca is made by Tricentis.
Which should I choose, OpenText Functional Testing or Tricentis Tosca?
Choose OpenText Functional Testing if you value covers many application technologies and ai makes tests less brittle. Choose Tricentis Tosca if you value non-developers can build tests and tests survive app changes.