kitio.aiOpenText Functional Testing vs CoTester
A side-by-side look at pricing plans, free tiers, features, pros and cons, updated for 2026. OpenText Functional Testing starts at See pricing page and CoTester starts at $249/mo. Check both pricing pages for current plans.
Enterprise test automation with AI object recognition, formerly UFT One
Free trialAt a glance
Best for
Pricing model
Starting price
Free plan
Made by
Based in
Rating
Key features
- AI object recognition
- Regression and API testing
- Model-based testing
- Desktop, web and mobile support
- On-premises or cloud deployment
- AI test case generation
- Self-healing tests
- Real device and browser runs
- AI bug summaries
- On-premise deployment option
| Feature | OpenText Functional Testing | CoTester |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Enterprise test automation with AI object recognition, formerly UFT One | TestGrid's AI agent that writes, runs and repairs software tests |
| Category | Coding | Coding |
| Pricing model | Free trial | Free trial |
| Starting price | See pricing page | $249/mo |
| Free plan | No, trial available | No, trial available |
| Made by | OpenText | TestGrid |
| Based in | Canada | – |
| Rating | No ratings yet | No ratings yet |
| Key features |
|
|
Pricing compared
OpenText Functional Testing starts at See pricing page and CoTester starts at $249/mo. Check both pricing pages for current plans.
Free plan
Cheapest paid plan
Top plan
Free trial
2 plans
Starter
$249/mo
- Per user
- 4 devices or browsers
- 5,000 tokens
- All AI testing agents
Growth
Contact sales
- Unlimited tokens
- SSO, LDAP and MFA
- On-premise or private cloud
Prices in USD, checked Nov 5, 2026 or later. Plans change often, so confirm on each tool's site before you buy.
Pros and cons
OpenText Functional Testing
- Covers many application technologies
- AI makes tests less brittle
- Long track record in enterprise QA
- Pricing not published
- Heavyweight for small teams
- Licensing can be complex
CoTester
- Tests run on real devices
- All AI agents included in the price
- Private and on-premise options
- Per-seat price is high for small teams
- Starter limits devices and tokens
- Growth pricing needs a sales call
Which one should you choose?
Choose OpenText Functional Testing if you want:
- Covers many application technologies
- AI makes tests less brittle
- Long track record in enterprise QA
Watch out: pricing not published.
Choose CoTester if you want:
- Tests run on real devices
- All AI agents included in the price
- Private and on-premise options
Watch out: per-seat price is high for small teams.
OpenText Functional Testing vs CoTester FAQ
What is the difference between OpenText Functional Testing and CoTester?
OpenText Functional Testing: Enterprise test automation with AI object recognition, formerly UFT One. CoTester: TestGrid's AI agent that writes, runs and repairs software tests. Both are coding tools.
Is OpenText Functional Testing or CoTester cheaper?
OpenText Functional Testing starts at See pricing page and CoTester starts at $249/mo. Check both pricing pages for current plans.
Do OpenText Functional Testing and CoTester have free plans?
OpenText Functional Testing: No, trial available. CoTester: No, trial available.
Who makes OpenText Functional Testing?
OpenText Functional Testing is made by OpenText, based in Canada.
Who makes CoTester?
CoTester is made by TestGrid.
Which should I choose, OpenText Functional Testing or CoTester?
Choose OpenText Functional Testing if you value covers many application technologies and ai makes tests less brittle. Choose CoTester if you value tests run on real devices and all ai agents included in the price.