mini-SWE-agent vs Marmot
A side-by-side look at pricing plans, free tiers, features, pros and cons, updated for 2026. mini-SWE-agent starts at Free and Marmot starts at Free. Check both pricing pages for current plans.
At a glance
Best for
Pricing model
Starting price
Free plan
Made by
Based in
Rating
Key features
- Bash-only agent loop
- Works with any model via LiteLLM
- Docker and sandbox environments
- SWE-bench batch runner
- Trajectory inspector
- Python bindings
- Text generation from the shell
- Web search and scraping
- Text to speech
- Person and company enrichment
- JSON output
- Agent skill
| Feature | mini-SWE-agent | Marmot |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Minimal open-source coding agent that works through bash alone | Open-source CLI for AI models, web search and data enrichment |
| Category | Coding | Coding |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Free plan | Yes, fully free | Yes, fully free |
| Made by | SWE-agent team (Princeton and Stanford) | Marmot |
| Based in | United States | – |
| Rating | No ratings yet | No ratings yet |
| Key features |
|
|
Pricing compared
mini-SWE-agent starts at Free and Marmot starts at Free. Check both pricing pages for current plans.
Free plan
Cheapest paid plan
Top plan
Free trial
Prices in USD, checked Nov 5, 2026 or later. Plans change often, so confirm on each tool's site before you buy.
Pros and cons
mini-SWE-agent
- Small codebase that is easy to read and modify
- Model-agnostic through common LLM routers
- Strong SWE-bench results for its size
- No graphical interface
- You pay for your own model API usage
- Aimed more at research than everyday editing
Marmot
- One interface for many providers
- Composable with Unix pipes
- MIT licensed
- Command-line only
- Provider usage may cost extra
Which one should you choose?
Choose mini-SWE-agent if you want:
- Small codebase that is easy to read and modify
- Model-agnostic through common LLM routers
- Strong SWE-bench results for its size
Watch out: no graphical interface.
Choose Marmot if you want:
- One interface for many providers
- Composable with Unix pipes
- MIT licensed
Watch out: command-line only.
mini-SWE-agent vs Marmot FAQ
What is the difference between mini-SWE-agent and Marmot?
mini-SWE-agent: Minimal open-source coding agent that works through bash alone. Marmot: Open-source CLI for AI models, web search and data enrichment. Both are coding tools.
Is mini-SWE-agent or Marmot cheaper?
mini-SWE-agent starts at Free and Marmot starts at Free. Check both pricing pages for current plans.
Do mini-SWE-agent and Marmot have free plans?
mini-SWE-agent: Yes, fully free. Marmot: Yes, fully free.
Who makes mini-SWE-agent?
mini-SWE-agent is made by SWE-agent team (Princeton and Stanford), based in United States.
Who makes Marmot?
Marmot is made by Marmot.
Which should I choose, mini-SWE-agent or Marmot?
Choose mini-SWE-agent if you value small codebase that is easy to read and modify and model-agnostic through common llm routers. Choose Marmot if you value one interface for many providers and composable with unix pipes.