kitio.aimini-SWE-agent vs Stakpak
A side-by-side look at pricing plans, free tiers, features, pros and cons, updated for 2026. mini-SWE-agent is completely free, while Stakpak is freemium.
At a glance
Best for
Pricing model
Starting price
Free plan
Made by
Based in
Rating
Key features
- Bash-only agent loop
- Works with any model via LiteLLM
- Docker and sandbox environments
- SWE-bench batch runner
- Trajectory inspector
- Python bindings
- Autonomous app monitoring
- Auto-healing and fixes
- Cloud cost scans
- Network sandbox
- Secret substitution
- LLM gateway
| Feature | mini-SWE-agent | Stakpak |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Minimal open-source coding agent that works through bash alone | Open-source agent that monitors and fixes your apps in production |
| Category | Coding | Coding |
| Pricing model | Free | Freemium |
| Starting price | Free | $15/mo |
| Free plan | Yes, fully free | Yes |
| Made by | SWE-agent team (Princeton and Stanford) | Stakpak |
| Based in | United States | – |
| Rating | No ratings yet | No ratings yet |
| Key features |
|
|
Pricing compared
mini-SWE-agent is completely free, while Stakpak is freemium.
Free plan
Cheapest paid plan
Top plan
Free trial
5 plans
Open Source
Free
- Self-hosted agent
- Bring your own model
Hacker
$15/mo
- 3 apps on autopilot
- $10 gateway credits a month
- Private skills and audit logs
Builder
$45/mo
- 10 apps on autopilot
- $35 gateway credits a month
- $5 per extra app
Team
$450/mo
- 50 apps, unlimited users
- $350 shared credits a month
- SSO and Slack integration
Enterprise
Custom
- Unlimited apps
- Dedicated support and onboarding
Prices in USD, checked Nov 5, 2026 or later. Plans change often, so confirm on each tool's site before you buy.
Pros and cons
mini-SWE-agent
- Small codebase that is easy to read and modify
- Model-agnostic through common LLM routers
- Strong SWE-bench results for its size
- No graphical interface
- You pay for your own model API usage
- Aimed more at research than everyday editing
Stakpak
- Open source under Apache 2.0
- Keeps secrets away from model providers
- Runs on your own machines
- Hosted plans charge fees on credit top-ups
- Future plans may change after the Vercel deal
- Needs care when granting production access
Which one should you choose?
Choose mini-SWE-agent if you want:
- Small codebase that is easy to read and modify
- Model-agnostic through common LLM routers
- Strong SWE-bench results for its size
Watch out: no graphical interface.
Choose Stakpak if you want:
- Open source under Apache 2.0
- Keeps secrets away from model providers
- Runs on your own machines
Watch out: hosted plans charge fees on credit top-ups.
mini-SWE-agent vs Stakpak FAQ
What is the difference between mini-SWE-agent and Stakpak?
mini-SWE-agent: Minimal open-source coding agent that works through bash alone. Stakpak: Open-source agent that monitors and fixes your apps in production. Both are coding tools.
Is mini-SWE-agent or Stakpak cheaper?
mini-SWE-agent is completely free, while Stakpak is freemium.
Do mini-SWE-agent and Stakpak have free plans?
mini-SWE-agent: Yes, fully free. Stakpak: Yes.
Who makes mini-SWE-agent?
mini-SWE-agent is made by SWE-agent team (Princeton and Stanford), based in United States.
Who makes Stakpak?
Stakpak is made by Stakpak.
Which should I choose, mini-SWE-agent or Stakpak?
Choose mini-SWE-agent if you value small codebase that is easy to read and modify and model-agnostic through common llm routers. Choose Stakpak if you value open source under apache 2.0 and keeps secrets away from model providers.