DeepSeekNon-reasoning Released October 2026
How DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 compares with the other 91 ranked language models.
Better for simple tasks. Ranked #72 of 92 on the overall intelligence score, ahead of 22% of models.
Fast writer. Writes about 111 words per second, faster than 81% of models.
Answers right away. You wait about 1.0 sec before the answer starts.
Cheap to use. $0.53 per million tokens, cheaper than 79% of models.
Good for
Not ideal for
Intelligence
19
overall score
#72 of 92typical 30
Coding
–
coding score
typical –
Speed
149
tokens per second
#18 of 92typical 91
Wait
1.0 sec
before it replies
#5 of 78typical 14s
Price
$0.53
per 1M tokens
#19 of 86typical $2.00
Scores on individual tests that make up the intelligence score. The faint line marks the best score of any model.
Humanity's Last Exam
Very hard expert questions across many subjects
SciCode
Writing code to solve science research problems
Long documents
Finding and reasoning over facts in very long texts
Terminal-Bench
Doing real tasks on a computer by itself, like an agent
This model next to the models closest to it. Click another bar to open that model.
Through the API, at the listed price. Chat apps usually charge a monthly plan instead.
1,000 chat replies
a question and a ~350-word answer, 1,000 times
Summarise a 100-page report
about 50,000 words in, a one-page summary out
Write a 2,000-word article
a short brief in, a long article out
Input, per 1M tokens
$0.30
Output, per 1M tokens
$1.20
Median times measured through the API.
1 token is about ¾ of a word. Speeds change with server load, so treat these as typical, not guaranteed.
Higher effort settings think longer: smarter, but slower and pricier.
Other companies' models with the closest intelligence score.
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis, an independent benchmarking company. Rankings refresh every few hours.
kitio.ai