kitio.aiPolyaxon vs Kubeflow
A side-by-side look at pricing plans, free tiers, features, pros and cons, updated for 2026. Kubeflow is completely free, while Polyaxon is freemium.
Open-source control plane for ML training, serving and agents on Kubernetes
Freemium · $555/moAt a glance
Best for
Category
Pricing model
Starting price
Free plan
Made by
Based in
Rating
Key features
- Training and fine-tuning jobs
- Hyperparameter sweeps and DAGs
- Model serving and notebooks
- Experiment tracking and registry
- Agent sandboxes
- Access policies and audit logs
- Kubeflow Pipelines
- Distributed training
- Hyperparameter tuning
- Hosted notebooks
- Model registry
- Spark Operator
| Feature | Polyaxon | Kubeflow |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Open-source control plane for ML training, serving and agents on Kubernetes | Open-source Kubernetes stack for training and serving AI models |
| Category | Models & APIs | Models & APIs |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Free |
| Starting price | $555/mo | Free |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes, fully free |
| Made by | Polyaxon | Kubeflow community (CNCF) |
| Based in | – | – |
| Rating | No ratings yet | No ratings yet |
| Key features |
|
|
Pricing compared
Kubeflow is completely free, while Polyaxon is freemium.
Free plan
Cheapest paid plan
Top plan
Free trial
4 plans
Open Source
Free
- Self-hosted
- Core tracking and scheduling
Platform
$555/mo
- 3 developer seats
- 1 compute cluster
- 50 concurrent runs
- Collaboration features
Teams
$1500/mo
- 6 developer seats
- 2 compute clusters
- Teams management
- Priority support
Enterprise
Custom
- Custom seats
- Custom policies and deployment
Prices in USD, checked Nov 5, 2026 or later. Plans change often, so confirm on each tool's site before you buy.
Pros and cons
Polyaxon
- Self-hosted, data stays on your infra
- Covers training, serving and tracking
- Free for academics
- Paid plans start at a high price
- Requires Kubernetes expertise
- Extra seats and clusters cost more
Kubeflow
- Free and open source
- Runs on any Kubernetes cluster
- Modular, use only the parts you need
- Requires Kubernetes knowledge to operate
- Setup and upgrades take real effort
- No official managed version from the project
Which one should you choose?
Choose Polyaxon if you want:
- Self-hosted, data stays on your infra
- Covers training, serving and tracking
- Free for academics
Watch out: paid plans start at a high price.
Choose Kubeflow if you want:
- Free and open source
- Runs on any Kubernetes cluster
- Modular, use only the parts you need
Watch out: requires kubernetes knowledge to operate.
Polyaxon vs Kubeflow FAQ
What is the difference between Polyaxon and Kubeflow?
Polyaxon: Open-source control plane for ML training, serving and agents on Kubernetes. Kubeflow: Open-source Kubernetes stack for training and serving AI models. Both are models & apis tools.
Is Polyaxon or Kubeflow cheaper?
Kubeflow is completely free, while Polyaxon is freemium.
Do Polyaxon and Kubeflow have free plans?
Polyaxon: Yes. Kubeflow: Yes, fully free.
Who makes Polyaxon?
Polyaxon is made by Polyaxon.
Who makes Kubeflow?
Kubeflow is made by Kubeflow community (CNCF).
Which should I choose, Polyaxon or Kubeflow?
Choose Polyaxon if you value self-hosted, data stays on your infra and covers training, serving and tracking. Choose Kubeflow if you value free and open source and runs on any kubernetes cluster.