kitio.aiClearML vs Polyaxon
A side-by-side look at pricing plans, free tiers, features, pros and cons, updated for 2026. ClearML has the lower starting price: about $15 a month, against $555 for Polyaxon.
At a glance
Best for
Category
Pricing model
Starting price
Free plan
Made by
Based in
Rating
Key features
- Experiment management
- Dataset versioning
- Pipeline automation
- Hyperparameter optimization
- GPU job scheduling
- Model repository
- Training and fine-tuning jobs
- Hyperparameter sweeps and DAGs
- Model serving and notebooks
- Experiment tracking and registry
- Agent sandboxes
- Access policies and audit logs
| Feature | ClearML | Polyaxon |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Open-source MLOps and AI infrastructure platform for GPU clusters | Open-source control plane for ML training, serving and agents on Kubernetes |
| Category | Models & APIs | Models & APIs |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | $15/mo | $555/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Made by | ClearML | Polyaxon |
| Based in | – | – |
| Rating | No ratings yet | No ratings yet |
| Key features |
|
|
Pricing compared
ClearML has the lower starting price: about $15 a month, against $555 for Polyaxon.
Free plan
Cheapest paid plan
Top plan
Free trial
4 plans
Community
Free
- Up to 3 users
- Experiment management
- Dataset versioning
Pro
$15/mo
- Per user, plus usage
- Up to 10 users
- Cloud autoscaling
- Hyperparameter optimization
Scale
Custom quote
- For 8-48 GPUs
- VPC deployment
- Dynamic job scheduling
Enterprise
Contact sales
- On-prem or air-gapped
- Multi-tenant security
4 plans
Open Source
Free
- Self-hosted
- Core tracking and scheduling
Platform
$555/mo
- 3 developer seats
- 1 compute cluster
- 50 concurrent runs
- Collaboration features
Teams
$1500/mo
- 6 developer seats
- 2 compute clusters
- Teams management
- Priority support
Enterprise
Custom
- Custom seats
- Custom policies and deployment
Prices in USD, checked Nov 5, 2026 or later. Plans change often, so confirm on each tool's site before you buy.
Pros and cons
ClearML
- Free hosted tier for small teams
- Can run fully air-gapped
- Covers training through GPU scheduling
- Pro adds usage fees on top of seats
- Scale plans need a custom quote
- Many components to learn
Polyaxon
- Self-hosted, data stays on your infra
- Covers training, serving and tracking
- Free for academics
- Paid plans start at a high price
- Requires Kubernetes expertise
- Extra seats and clusters cost more
Which one should you choose?
Choose ClearML if you want:
- Free hosted tier for small teams
- Can run fully air-gapped
- Covers training through GPU scheduling
Watch out: pro adds usage fees on top of seats.
Choose Polyaxon if you want:
- Self-hosted, data stays on your infra
- Covers training, serving and tracking
- Free for academics
Watch out: paid plans start at a high price.
ClearML vs Polyaxon FAQ
What is the difference between ClearML and Polyaxon?
ClearML: Open-source MLOps and AI infrastructure platform for GPU clusters. Polyaxon: Open-source control plane for ML training, serving and agents on Kubernetes. Both are models & apis tools.
Is ClearML or Polyaxon cheaper?
ClearML has the lower starting price: about $15 a month, against $555 for Polyaxon.
Do ClearML and Polyaxon have free plans?
ClearML: Yes. Polyaxon: Yes.
Who makes ClearML?
ClearML is made by ClearML.
Who makes Polyaxon?
Polyaxon is made by Polyaxon.
Which should I choose, ClearML or Polyaxon?
Choose ClearML if you value free hosted tier for small teams and can run fully air-gapped. Choose Polyaxon if you value self-hosted, data stays on your infra and covers training, serving and tracking.