kitio.ain8n vs OpenJarvis
A side-by-side look at pricing plans, free tiers, features, pros and cons, updated for 2026. OpenJarvis is completely free, while n8n is freemium.
At a glance
Best for
Pricing model
Starting price
Free plan
Made by
Based in
Rating
Key features
- Node-based workflow editor
- AI Agent node
- JavaScript and Python code nodes
- MCP client and server
- Self-hosted Community Edition
- Local-first agent runtime
- Morning digest preset
- Deep research agent
- Skill imports
- Energy and cost benchmarks
| Feature | n8n | OpenJarvis |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Source-available workflow automation you can self-host | Open-source framework for personal AI agents that run on your own device |
| Category | Agents & automation | Agents & automation |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Free |
| Starting price | $24/mo | Free |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes, fully free |
| Made by | n8n GmbH | Stanford Hazy Research |
| Based in | Germany | United States |
| Rating | No ratings yet | No ratings yet |
| Key features |
|
|
Pricing compared
OpenJarvis is completely free, while n8n is freemium.
Free plan
Cheapest paid plan
Top plan
Free trial
5 plans
Community
Free
- Self-hosted
- Free and source-available
Starter
$24/mo
- 2.5K workflow executions
- 5 concurrent executions
- 1,600 Assistant credits/month
Pro
$60/mo
- 10K workflow executions
- Up to 50 concurrent executions
- 3 shared projects
Business
€667/mo billed yearly
- 40K workflow executions
- SSO and LDAP
- Self-hosted
Enterprise
Contact sales
- 200+ concurrent executions
- 365 days of insights
- External secret stores
1 plan
Open source
Free
- Apache 2.0 license
- Runs on your own hardware
- Optional cloud model engines
Prices in USD, checked Oct 28, 2026 or later. Plans change often, so confirm on each tool's site before you buy.
Pros and cons
n8n
- Free to self-host
- Billed per execution, not per step
- Code steps when no-code falls short
- Self-hosting means owning updates and security
- Short log retention on the cheapest cloud plan
OpenJarvis
- Free and Apache 2.0 licensed
- Runs on local models by default
- Ready-made presets for common agents
- Browser GUI from source needs Node.js 22+
- Larger local models need strong hardware
- Young project, so features change often
Which one should you choose?
Choose n8n if you want:
- Free to self-host
- Billed per execution, not per step
- Code steps when no-code falls short
Watch out: self-hosting means owning updates and security.
Choose OpenJarvis if you want:
- Free and Apache 2.0 licensed
- Runs on local models by default
- Ready-made presets for common agents
Watch out: browser gui from source needs node.js 22+.
n8n vs OpenJarvis FAQ
What is the difference between n8n and OpenJarvis?
n8n: Source-available workflow automation you can self-host. OpenJarvis: Open-source framework for personal AI agents that run on your own device. Both are agents & automation tools.
Is n8n or OpenJarvis cheaper?
OpenJarvis is completely free, while n8n is freemium.
Do n8n and OpenJarvis have free plans?
n8n: Yes. OpenJarvis: Yes, fully free.
Who makes n8n?
n8n is made by n8n GmbH, based in Germany.
Who makes OpenJarvis?
OpenJarvis is made by Stanford Hazy Research, based in United States.
Which should I choose, n8n or OpenJarvis?
Choose n8n if you value free to self-host and billed per execution, not per step. Choose OpenJarvis if you value free and apache 2.0 licensed and runs on local models by default.