CandorIQ vs EVA.ai
A side-by-side look at pricing plans, free tiers, features, pros and cons, updated for 2026. CandorIQ has the lower starting price: about $4 a month, against $600 for EVA.ai.
At a glance
Best for
Pricing model
Starting price
Free plan
Made by
Based in
Rating
Key features
- Headcount scenario planning
- Compensation cycle agent
- Payband builder
- Candidate offers
- Flight risk analysis
- Org chart visualisation
- Competency mapping
- Conversational evidence gathering
- Redeployment and promotion advice
- Candidate shortlisting
- Multilingual interviews
| Feature | CandorIQ | EVA.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | AI agents for headcount planning and compensation cycles | AI agent that gathers evidence for workforce and skills decisions |
| Category | Legal, finance & HR | Legal, finance & HR |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $4/mo | $7200/yr |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Made by | CandorIQ | EVA.ai |
| Based in | United States | – |
| Rating | No ratings yet | No ratings yet |
| Key features |
|
|
Pricing compared
CandorIQ has the lower starting price: about $4 a month, against $600 for EVA.ai.
Free plan
Cheapest paid plan
Top plan
Free trial
3 plans
Headcount & Workforce
$4/mo
- Per employee
- Headcount scenarios
- Requests and approvals
- Position management
Compensation & Total Rewards
$9/mo
- Per employee
- Comp builder and cycles
- Candidate offers
- AI agent
Enterprise
Contact sales
- Both modules
- Custom terms
2 plans
Self-Service with EVA SuperBot
$7200/yr
- 12-month subscription
- Up to 250 people
- Self-declared competencies
Managed by EVA
$16000 one-time
- One project, fixed fee
- Up to 300 people
- Analysis in under 10 weeks
Prices in USD, checked Oct 29, 2026 or later. Plans change often, so confirm on each tool's site before you buy.
Pros and cons
CandorIQ
- Joins HR and Finance planning
- Modules can be bought separately
- Shows budget impact before hiring
- Priced per employee
- Demo needed to get started
- No free plan
EVA.ai
- Fixed, published project pricing
- Gathers input from staff and managers
- Works across languages and countries
- Expensive for small teams
- Plans cover only 250 to 300 people
- Requires a sales call to start
Which one should you choose?
Choose CandorIQ if you want:
- Joins HR and Finance planning
- Modules can be bought separately
- Shows budget impact before hiring
Watch out: priced per employee.
Choose EVA.ai if you want:
- Fixed, published project pricing
- Gathers input from staff and managers
- Works across languages and countries
Watch out: expensive for small teams.
CandorIQ vs EVA.ai FAQ
What is the difference between CandorIQ and EVA.ai?
CandorIQ: AI agents for headcount planning and compensation cycles. EVA.ai: AI agent that gathers evidence for workforce and skills decisions. Both are legal, finance & hr tools.
Is CandorIQ or EVA.ai cheaper?
CandorIQ has the lower starting price: about $4 a month, against $600 for EVA.ai.
Do CandorIQ and EVA.ai have free plans?
CandorIQ: No. EVA.ai: No.
Who makes CandorIQ?
CandorIQ is made by CandorIQ, based in United States.
Who makes EVA.ai?
EVA.ai is made by EVA.ai.
Which should I choose, CandorIQ or EVA.ai?
Choose CandorIQ if you value joins hr and finance planning and modules can be bought separately. Choose EVA.ai if you value fixed, published project pricing and gathers input from staff and managers.