kitio.aiStark vs Attention Insight
A side-by-side look at pricing plans, free tiers, features, pros and cons, updated for 2026. Stark has the lower starting price: about $17 a month, against $31 for Attention Insight.
At a glance
Best for
Pricing model
Starting price
Free plan
Made by
Based in
Rating
Key features
- Figma and Sketch plugins
- Automated WCAG scans
- AI-powered fix suggestions
- Browser and GitHub tools
- Compliance Center
- Project reports
- Attention heatmaps
- Clarity score
- Areas of interest
- Figma plugin
- Chrome extension
| Feature | Stark | Attention Insight |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Accessibility checks and AI fixes across design files and code | Predictive attention heatmaps for designs before launch |
| Category | Design | Design |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Free trial |
| Starting price | $198/yr | $31/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No, trial available |
| Made by | Stark | Attention Insight |
| Based in | – | Lithuania |
| Rating | No ratings yet | No ratings yet |
| Key features |
|
|
Pricing compared
Stark has the lower starting price: about $17 a month, against $31 for Attention Insight.
Free plan
Cheapest paid plan
Top plan
Free trial
4 plans
Premium Pack
$198/yr
- Per user
- Minimum 3 seats
- Automated fixes in Figma
- Browser WCAG scans
Launch
$2500/yr
- 3 editors, 25 viewers
- Monitor up to 100 pages
- Weekly scans and reports
Grow
$8000/yr
- 10 editors, 50 viewers
- Monitor up to 1,000 pages
- Daily scans
Scale
$21000/yr
- 20 editors, unlimited viewers
- Monitor up to 4,000 pages
- Real-time scans
4 plans
Basic
$31/mo
- 1 user seat
- 40 credits
Pro
$129/mo
- 2 user seats
- 200 credits
- Collaborate and share
Hero
$324/mo
- Unlimited credits (fair use)
- 30 min video testing
- 3,000 API transactions
- No watermark
Custom
Contact sales
- Custom user seats
- Custom video testing
- Service level agreement
Prices in USD, checked Oct 28, 2026 or later. Plans change often, so confirm on each tool's site before you buy.
Pros and cons
Stark
- Covers design, code and live sites
- Free plan to get started
- Works inside Figma and GitHub
- Audit-ready compliance tracking
- Team plans start at $2,500 a year
- Premium Pack needs at least 3 seats
- AI remediation is Figma-only on Premium
Attention Insight
- Feedback without user tests
- Works inside Figma
- Easy A/B comparisons
- Predictions are not real user data
- Paid plans cost more than basic tools
Which one should you choose?
Choose Stark if you want:
- Covers design, code and live sites
- Free plan to get started
- Works inside Figma and GitHub
Watch out: team plans start at $2,500 a year.
Choose Attention Insight if you want:
- Feedback without user tests
- Works inside Figma
- Easy A/B comparisons
Watch out: predictions are not real user data.
Stark vs Attention Insight FAQ
What is the difference between Stark and Attention Insight?
Stark: Accessibility checks and AI fixes across design files and code. Attention Insight: Predictive attention heatmaps for designs before launch. Both are design tools.
Is Stark or Attention Insight cheaper?
Stark has the lower starting price: about $17 a month, against $31 for Attention Insight.
Do Stark and Attention Insight have free plans?
Stark: Yes. Attention Insight: No, trial available.
Who makes Stark?
Stark is made by Stark.
Who makes Attention Insight?
Attention Insight is made by Attention Insight, based in Lithuania.
Which should I choose, Stark or Attention Insight?
Choose Stark if you value covers design, code and live sites and free plan to get started. Choose Attention Insight if you value feedback without user tests and works inside figma.